Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts in Suggest A Pokémon Archives Forum

RSS
Email

0 Points

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

Author

Comment

bentmetal

Re: Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

[-]

Suggestions Board Regular

Posts: 123

Aug 21 07 3:14 AM

Antarctros is not Pelliper's evo, its Wingulls. And Antactros, like all staff members is a legendary (or psuedolegenday) pokemon. Therefore, this firebird line wont have that particular counterpart.

Advertisement
	Remove this ad

Gelatop

Re: Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

[-]

Suggestions Board Regular

Posts: 2573

Aug 21 07 3:35 AM

Suggestions Board Regular

Uh, ShinE just said he finished the Antarctros counterpart?

bentmetal

Re: Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

[-]

Suggestions Board Regular

Posts: 123

Aug 21 07 5:24 AM

Sorry I didnt see that. Anyway Saharos wouldnt be a very good name.

A) Sahara suggests desert which doesnt really imply Fire type.
B) Antarctros' name is based on the albatros (if my guess is correct), and obviously the fire line is not based on an albatross

Gelatop

Re: Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

[-]

Suggestions Board Regular

Posts: 2573

Aug 21 07 5:52 AM

Suggestions Board Regular

Sahara implies heat, and os is a classic ending!

Advertisement
	Remove this ad

bentmetal

Re: Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

[-]

Suggestions Board Regular

Posts: 123

Aug 21 07 6:19 AM

I dont know. Yeah, deserts can be hot (not always), but I dont believe Sahara implies a fire type. It just doesnt work for me, sorry.

And, -os. If we are putting it as a counterpart to wingulls line, one wuld assume the same suffix suggests the same meaning, which it doesnt.

Basically what Im getting at is Saharos, while a good name, doesnt really work for this pokemon in my opinion.

Shining ShinE

Re: Wingull and Pelipper's Fiery Counterparts

[-]