Yuku free message boards

Why do things necessarily have to be opposite? Why must a pokemon, if it has two evolutions, necessarily be polarised against each other in every possible form? To me, going with Attacker/Special Attacker or Attaker/Defender or even simply Fighter/Supporter are enough to differentiate them. After all, the most recent Eevee evolutions aren't opposites. Steel and Ice are simply types to be used, and as you said they are underutilised so why not?

As for them looking liked amped up dragons with armour that could destroy anything... hrm, I don't see it. Honestly, I think they look fine. If anything, the only issue about them is that they don't look that much like Dragons. Otherwise they just have very cool designs. And cool designs doesn't equate to an uber-pokemon. It's stats, moves and typing that determine that, not so much looks.

As for not looking alike, you must be kidding. Steel type and Ice type share, at a quick glance: same style feet, same three-pronged tail, same overly large hands, same large sweeping crests on their heads, and wings. Only thing different is the colours and the lines of these things, where steel looks a bit more jagged than the curves of the Ice one. It's really well done, as far as I'm concerned.

And evolution method again doesn't have to match each other. They both evolve using an object that relates to the type they evolve into, which is good enough for me. Not everything has to be about convention, duality, parallels and the like. If he decides to change it to be two of the stones that extend weather conditions, then cool, but otherwise it's fine.

Why is it really bad Zeta? Your core concepts all seem fine, the only things that you were a bit off on were the technical stats and the like, which is a more advanced area anyway. I actually really like these dragons, so I hope you continue with them.