Evolution problem. in Feedback Forum

RSS
Email

0 Points

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Evolution problem.

Author

Comment

wierdo203

Evolution problem.

Lead

[-]

Posts: 8

Mar 1 03 8:17 AM

More
- My Recent Posts

Tags : None

I was looking around the old style Pokmon section, and I wondered if it didn't count, because #367, Redda, is an Ekans prevolution, and in the new section, #PF052 is Ardyh, an Arbok Evolution. I was just wondering about this, because it seems to violate the 3-to-a-family maximum.

Advertisement
	Remove this ad Remove this ad

Culbo1

Re: Evolution problem.

[-]

Posts: 135

Mar 1 03 3:52 PM

More
- My Recent Posts

The old style Pokemon have nothing to do with the new ones we've made. Those old ones are from years ago and aren't counted as being apart of the new section.

Darkwolf

Really...

[-]

Posts: 161

Mar 4 03 4:12 PM

Registered User

More
- My Recent Posts

Yeah, but it seems that Nintendo wasnt the first who thought of baby Pokemon, because Redda was obviously suggested and made before The original and official baby Pokes came out.

Ryushikaze

Re: Really...

[-]

Suggestions Board Regular

Posts: 470

Apr 19 03 11:44 AM

More
- My Recent Posts

Yeah, probably so, but the point still remains the old PF archives are merely that, the old archives, and have no current bearing on the evolution and creation patterns of new fake pokes.

The power of one is naught compared to the power of cheese.
If insanity is a virtue, I am assured a spot in heaven. If not, I'm too wacko to care!
They said it was impossible, and that I'd die trying. So far, they're half right.
Ryu Shikaze,
Lord High God of BSing and Kaiser Du Kaiser
But there are those who call me...

...Tim!

Elfgirl Mchan

Re: Really...

[-]

Posts: 375

Apr 22 03 9:00 AM

Suggestions Board Regular

More
- My Recent Posts

GYAH!! I was trying to reply to this and all because I wasn't logged in the computer wound up accidentally deleting my post! And I could have sworn I'd put my password in its box! Ah well...I was basically quoting what the site itself says concerning the PF Classics archive...

Quote:
This archive contains the pokmon made by the Pokmon Factory in its earlier incarnation. Please bear in mind that the guidelines for acceptable ideas were much looser when most of these were made. They remain on the site through a desire to preserve our history.

So they're just memories and there to keep from being lost...and as Ryu said, since they have no current bearing on the evolution and creation patterns of new fake Pokemon, there's nothing to worry about with them. Besides...it is fun to browse through the old archives when you're bored and have nothing else to do! XD

Guardian of the city...protector of the innocent...fighter for love and peace! I...am...THE GREAT SAIYMCHAN!!!

Botispine

Re: Really...

[-]