<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Is the Magic type redundant?</title>
        <link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4580/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ With the development of the Fairy type in Generation VI, the Magic type seems to have little to distinguish it from the Fairy type. In case one complains, "but there's such slight difference between the Ground type and the Rock type, and Nintendo still allows those", the two types do have significant differences. The Ground type's moves relate to tectonics, subterranean things, sand, sediment, particulate matter and mud, while the Rock type's moves relate to actual rocks or activities or... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011,  </copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:54:59 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku  Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Is the Magic type redundant? ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92913/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant#reply-92913</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fairy types seem to be more dainty, and represent not physical, but Spiritual light ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Master of Memes)</author>
			<membersince>12/28/15</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92913</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:54:58 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Is the Magic type redundant? ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92770/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant#reply-92770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I had not seen the X/Y Mechanics spoiler page. I believe I was avoiding exposure to X/Y spoilers at the time it was relevant. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.
I was aware of the religious aspects of the Magic type, but could not fathom how to ...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92770/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant#reply-92770">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Coolsteph)</author>
			<membersince>03/15/10</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92770</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 02:53:51 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Is the Magic type redundant? ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92769/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant#reply-92769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ First of all, the Staff don't really want to discuss this, although that was posted nine months ago and we haven't seen their clear intentions yet.The Magic type is not unexplained phenomena, though. Many Pokemon (like Dallami and the Mummeow line) and mo...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92769/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant#reply-92769">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flarsable)</author>
			<membersince>04/29/08</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/92769</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:59:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Is the Magic type redundant? ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4580/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ With the development of the Fairy type in Generation VI, the Magic type seems to have little to distinguish it from the Fairy type. In case one complains, "but there's such slight difference between the Ground type and the Rock type, and Nintendo still al...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4580/Is-the-Magic-type-redundant">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Coolsteph)</author>
			<membersince>03/15/10</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4580</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:48:29 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
