<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!! </title>
        <link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4398/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Gobully (GOBlin+BULLY)HT: 2' 11"WT: 50.7 lbsAbilities: Pickup/Cheater*DW Ability: PickPocketDescription: This Pokemon is obviously based on a goblin, so it looks like a humanoid creature with long, thick arms, thick claws, a dog-like muzzle and cat-like eyes, a stiff, almost reptilian tail, darkish brown in color, and black colored hair on its head.&nbsp; Also, it has long, triangular ears.Dex A: This Pokemon follows its Hobgreed leaders in order to steal money from Trainers and towns.... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011,  </copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:21:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku  Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89908/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Closed by poketamer's request over PM. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BonzaiRob)</author>
			<membersince>06/23/02</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89908</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:21:29 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89723/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Okay, I've explained the Ability Cheater a bit more accurately.&nbsp;Also, just because Emperorc has the word orc in the name doesn't mean it has to look exactly like an orc.&nbsp; I wanted Emperorc to look&nbsp;a bit like an orc, but at the same time kee...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89723/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89723">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (poketamer94)</author>
			<membersince>06/10/11</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89723</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 19:51:22 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89704/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89704</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Actually, going back to Cheater for a moment, you should change the flavor text so it actually tells us what it does. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flarsable)</author>
			<membersince>04/29/08</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89704</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:31:51 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89703/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89703</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ considering that it has orc in its name, you might want to lose the dog-face and give it something more humanlike. Green skin wouldn't hurt either.
Of course as the leader of the Hobgreed and Gobully, he should be decked out in all the bling they steal, ...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89703/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89703">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SCD)</author>
			<membersince>03/30/10</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89703</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:47:31 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89701/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok then, now that we've gotten Gem Crush out of the way, what do you guys think about Emperorc? Is there anything that needs to be fixed with this Pokemon? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (poketamer94)</author>
			<membersince>06/10/11</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89701</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:13:26 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89692/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ @Unova Star: I did stop. Probably Poketamer has decided to keep the 40 base power. This move is similar but not the same to those moves. Gem Crush only gets a critical hit when the foe is holding a gem. So I've fixed my mistakes in this thread. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZeroChill)</author>
			<membersince>05/28/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89692</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:50:14 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89683/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ @ZeroChill: Please stop, okay. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unova Star)</author>
			<membersince>03/30/11</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89683</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:35:04 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89648/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That means overall power if base power is 40 with STAB is 60. I think that's fine. I didn't read it properly SCD so I though it always resulted in a critical hit. But 40 power for Gem Crush seems ok. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZeroChill)</author>
			<membersince>05/28/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89648</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:20:17 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89647/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ZeroChill wrote:&nbsp;And Flars Gem Crush does always result in a critical hit.The way poketamer has worded the description implies that the attack crits only if the target is holding a gem. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SCD)</author>
			<membersince>03/30/10</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89647</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:25:52 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89645/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If that is the case then make the base power 35. If it results in a critical hit it turns to 70, and with STAB, 105. if you want to keep 40 base powered Gem Crush, include a recoil as the move, when used on Gobully and any other Dark type would result in ...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89645/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89645">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZeroChill)</author>
			<membersince>05/28/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89645</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:04:28 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89632/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89632</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The calculations are wrong, and the attack doesn't ALWAYS score a critical hit. With a crit, the power is 80, and with STAB it's 120. But that's only if they are holding a Gem and haven't used it yet. Incinerate really is an underpowered move, so I think ...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89632/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89632">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flarsable)</author>
			<membersince>04/29/08</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89632</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:06:43 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89607/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Gem Crush seeing as it ALWAYS results in a critical hit and with STAB from the Gobilly line, if it's power remained 40 the total amount of damage done when calculated would be 90 power. A critical hit Gem Crush with out STAB would be 60. Correct me if any...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89607/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89607">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZeroChill)</author>
			<membersince>05/28/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89607</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:30:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89566/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89566</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok, a couple of things:Flarsable &amp; SCD: your right Flare, Cheater does have a chance to disable ANY Ability (except for certain Abilities like Terravolt), so I'm keeping Cheater and not Mold Breaker.magemaster529: exactly, Deceit doesn't sound right f...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89566/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89566">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (poketamer94)</author>
			<membersince>06/10/11</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89566</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:55:46 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89512/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Why deceit? Cheater would make more sense for the effect. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (magemaster529)</author>
			<membersince>03/19/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89512</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:33:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89510/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ How about if Cheater is renamed Deceit? Just a suggestion. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZeroChill)</author>
			<membersince>05/28/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89510</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:24:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89508/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89508</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ SCD wrote:You know, Cheater is essentially a nerfed version of Mold Breaker. You should just give them that, I think.Well, no, because I think it disables ANY ability. Even things like Rain Dish or Swarm.&nbsp; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flarsable)</author>
			<membersince>04/29/08</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89508</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:18:58 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89497/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89497</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ How about Hobgreed evolves into Emperorc? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZeroChill)</author>
			<membersince>05/28/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89497</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:41:04 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89491/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You know, Cheater is essentially a nerfed version of Mold Breaker. You should just give them that, I think.Also I like the idea of Gem Crush. Though I think it could do with reducing the power to 30, like Incinerate. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SCD)</author>
			<membersince>03/30/10</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89491</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:38:44 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89475/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I wouldn't do that. Almost every new suggestion I've seen so far has a chain evolution. It gets boring after a while. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (magemaster529)</author>
			<membersince>03/19/12</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89475</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:03:21 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89468/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks ZeroChill, but I had an idea.&nbsp; I know that a few people don't like us suggestion chained evolutions (because it fills up the amount of space in the Pokedex Project) but still, I think I should include it.&nbsp; It's a chained evolved form of G...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89468/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves#reply-89468">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (poketamer94)</author>
			<membersince>06/10/11</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/reply/89468</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:57:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ These Pokemon Are Dirty Thieves!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4398/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Gobully (GOBlin+BULLY)HT: 2' 11"WT: 50.7 lbsAbilities: Pickup/Cheater*DW Ability: PickPocketDescription: This Pokemon is obviously based on a goblin, so it looks like a humanoid creature with long, thick arms, thick claws, a dog-like muzzle and cat-like e...<br /><a href="http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4398/These-Pokemon-Are-Dirty-Thieves">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (poketamer94)</author>
			<membersince>06/10/11</membersince>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://pfsuggestionsboard.yuku.com/topic/4398</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:44:45 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
